User talk:GVarnum-WMF

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, GVarnum-WMF!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 22:54, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Unnecessary renames

Dear GVarnum-WMF,

A lot off your recent renames seems to be unnecessary and against policy. “ more accurate name” and “more complete name” aren’t valid reasons to rename a file. Our policy clearly states that ‘’ Files should NOT be renamed only because the new name looks a bit better‘’ and a large part of your recent renames seem to fall in this category. After al: ‘’In general, Commons aims to provide stable file names as there might be external file clients and file moving involves significant human and computing resources.’’

I trust that you will take more care when doing renames in the future. We are talking about file which are heavily used which means that one has to take even more care when renaming a file.

Kind regards,

Natuur12 (talk) 15:09, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

@Natuur12: Thank you for the note - perhaps my edit summaries did not convey very well - but I think they were indeed within policy as they were changes to harmonize the files names of a set of images (Wikimedia Foundation logos), essentially at uploader's request as all but one (WM logo blue - which was both out of harmony with other "Wikimedia logo color" files and very ambiguous) were uploaded on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation, and many of the names were ambiguous - things like "Foundation" instead of "Wikimedia Foundation" whereas Foundation could basically apply to any Foundation - and "Wmf" or "WM" being rather ambiguous as well. Specifically the ambiguous issue is what I was trying to address with "more accurate name" and "more complete name". I apologize if you felt they were out of policy, but I do not agree they were simply to look a bit better. The desire to change them stemmed from the old names being confusing to people at times (exampled by people using the wrong logo and complaining later the names were too ambiguous) and had very poor harmony. We are very aware of their heavy use, which is why we felt less ambiguous and more harmonized names would serve everyone better. I will try to more specifically state which policy the rename relates to, I hope that helps address any concerns about any future renames made. --Gregory Varnum (Wikimedia Foundation) (talk) 01:21, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Since you did another rename (on which causes mass notification spam) I asked for the removal off your file mover flag. Natuur12 (talk) 17:30, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

@Natuur12: I am sorry you felt the need to escalade things without giving me the benefit of a response first. Would you be willing to respond to what I posted in reply to your post on this page and clarify what concerns you still have? Do you not believe these provide more harmony, are less ambiguous, and that uploader request applies to staff uploads as well? Thank you. --Gregory Varnum (Wikimedia Foundation) (talk) 17:51, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

See my responce. Natuur12 (talk) 18:06, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

You clearly don't follow Commons:File renaming. Right removed. Multichill (talk) 19:06, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

@Multichill: May I ask for clarity on how that policy was not followed, for my own benefit if nothing else? Is it that is that Image:Wikimedia_Foundation_logo_-_vertical_(2012-2016).svg is not less ambiguous and more harmonious than Image:Wmf_logo_vert_pms.svg and author request did not apply - or that I was not aware of how to disable the Spam aspect in advance? Thank you. --Gregory Varnum (Wikimedia Foundation) (talk) 19:17, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:Grant Ingersoll (e1568826053425).png

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Grant Ingersoll (e1568826053425).png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Grant Ingersoll (e1568826053425).png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:57, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Grant Ingersoll (e1568826053425).png

File:Grant Ingersoll (e1568826053425).png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: https://lucidworks.com/post/farewell-grant-ingersoll/ Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

@Patrick Rogel: Thank you for your diligence. I have forwarded permission from Lucidworks to OTRS, ticket# 2019092710006535. They provided permission before the photo was utilized under CC license on Foundation website. --Gregory Varnum (Wikimedia Foundation) (talk) 17:08, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

AL in

ALL: in 2001:9E8:4420:D100:D1A3:F205:2B58:3838 05:43, 26 April 2023 (UTC)