User talk:LA2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Tips: använd gärna Category:Images from Pieni tietosanakirja. Se också Category:Images from Nordisk familjebok. Den fjättrade ankan 00:37, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Trivium[edit]

Jag satt och bläddrade förstrött i de bilder från New Student's du har fixat och lade märke till en bild som jag tyckte mig känna igen. Mycket riktigt, bilden på en jordnötsplanta i Image:LA2-NSRW-3-0473.jpg är ju väldigt lik Image:Koeh-163.jpg från Koehler's Medicinal Plants från 1887. Det verkar som att mänsklig kunskap alltid har byggt på lån från andra... Thuresson 20:58, 15 October 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image deletion[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Hjalmar Bergman Wadkoping.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion on its entry.
Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Alx 21:45, 22 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wikisource de[edit]

http://de.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Skriptorium#.5B.5BMeyers_Blitz-Lexikon.5D.5D --Historiograf 23:24, 16 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Danke für den Hinweis. Nun geantwortet. --LA2 00:07, 22 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Delete empty pages from Category:Meyers Blitz-Lexikon?[edit]

Hi, I was wondering if empty pages like File:LA2-Blitz-0105.jpg (Image:LA2-Blitz-0105.jpg) from Category:Meyers Blitz-Lexikon should maybe deleted? Cheers, Siebrand 19:15, 26 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why, no, absolutely not! These images provide documentation that those book pages were blank. Are the blank pages disturbing you? Do you normally tear out blank pages from books in your local library? --LA2 19:20, 26 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Nope, I usually do not tear out those pages ;-). The empty pages do not disturb me particulary. Please do not regard my question as being more than that. It was posed to inform after your opinion.
My line of thinking was that in the digital age empty pages serve no purpose. On sites where I have seen scanned (old) books, especially with the ORC-ed content beside it, there was simply a remark about page so-and-so being empty. I thought that in this case the same could be done. Honestly I do not see the added value of the empty page, as there's not even a page number on it - i.e. completely blank. From that perspective Image:LA2-Blitz-0102.jpg and Image:LA2-Blitz-0105.jpg are the same (these are by the way as far as I can see the only two empty pages in the above category). Anyway, thank you for providing your opinion and I do hope you will contribute more of these old scanned books. Have you written a description of how you undertook the project? This might be helpfulp for others (and I am very interested in it). Siebrand 20:39, 26 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
See my user page on meta, m:User:LA2. Recently there was also a discussion on the de.wikisource Scriptorium (village pump). --LA2 20:43, 26 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tack[edit]

Tack för att du skapade alla kataloger för svenska kommuner, och kategoriserade in kommunvapen där de skulle vara. / Fred Chess 21:01, 27 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

För all del, det var ju bara ett fåtal som saknades. --LA2 21:03, 27 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Geo coordinates[edit]

Did you use any special upload tool for the Sialia_mexicana_07089.JPG? This image has geographic coordinates and links to some map servers, but I somehow suspect that you didn't fill in all the details by hand for every image. Some people use wiki templates for things like this. What tools do you use? --LA2 18:23, 29 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I use a Python script to generate the external links. I think it would be better to add a template to Commons for this purpose, but in the absence of other interested editors, I wasn't bold enough to do so. Your query suggests to me that it may be appropriate to rethink that choice. The template that I used as a model is Geolinks-US-cityscale on English Wikipedia. See en:User_talk:Wsiegmund/Archive_1#Geolink_for_Nisqually_National_Wildlife_Refuge_example. Thank you for your query and best wishes, Wsiegmund 02:34, 30 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi LA2; I've been using the coor template for awhile now (Image:Granite_Falls_26428.JPG). I'd like to give Map-LatLong and Gbmapping a try, but couldn't find the required parameters. Best wishes, Wsiegmund 05:27, 15 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Meyers Blitz-Lexikon and PD-Meyers[edit]

Hi, I changed Your Template:LA2-Blitz and included some of the images to Category:Meyers Konversations-Lexikon, which is not truly precise, but for organisation. I hope I didn't sabotage Your work ;) - discussion about that topic I'd suggest at Category talk:Meyers Konversations-Lexikon, if You like - greetings --W!B: 02:22, 15 March 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That looks fine! --LA2 20:27, 15 March 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OpenStreetMap is Creative Commons, not GFDL[edit]

You have listed Image:LA2-OSM-Frescati.png as dual licensed GFDL and Creative Commons, however OSM is only Creative Commons, you can't claim it is GFDL. edward

This is correct. It should be cc-by-sa-2.0. It appears the license tag inserted in my initial upload was set by a multiple-choice selector that might have slipped into the wrong position. --LA2 22:32, 16 December 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Combivisuell2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

83.85.95.146 18:03, 8 September 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Nationalencyklopedin2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

83.85.95.146 18:03, 8 September 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Image deletion warning Encyclopedia sample images have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these images, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Hi, an anonymous User nominated this image for speedydeletion, the reason was, that the source is wrong. Please fix this problem by correcting the source and remove the "no source" template. Im sorry for the inconvenience. --Martin H. (talk) 02:30, 1 October 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:LA2-Halland.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

130.238.140.120 10:11, 11 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Please remain calm and collegial[edit]

català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  magyar  Nederlands  português  polski  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  עברית  +/−


It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Attacking another user back can only satisfy trolls or anger contributors and leads to general bad feeling. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks! abf /talk to me/ 14:03, 26 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you, I'm perfectly calm. Are you? Can you please explain what caused you to bring me this warning? --LA2 (talk) 17:46, 26 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The reason was your latest edit to User talk:Cecil.[1] abf /talk to me/ 18:24, 26 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, I pointed out to Cecil that she needs to be more explicit on why exactly she wants to delete all images of buildings by Le Corbusier. I don't think I was uncalm, uncool or unpolite. The way she currently formulated her deletion requests, it was impossible to tell whether she really knows anything about the applicability of French copyright law or if she was just trolling. As you can perhaps see from this discussion page, I have sometimes been the target of such trolling attacks (from anonymous users), where my perfectly legitimate images have been requested for deletion. This consumes a lot of time and energy. Every deletion request is an expression of mistrust, and needs to be more carefully and politely worded. It would also have been polite for Cecil to respond to my request, rather than just removing it from her user discussion page. Perhaps she had a bad day. --LA2 (talk) 19:28, 26 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thanks for the numbered version, but could you regenerate it? Something went wrong with the Kames. They are little bitmaps in the original. The french and russian version seem fine but the others also show the same error. Regards. Lycaon (talk) 23:10, 11 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm a complete beginner with Inkscape. Can you explain what went wrong, and how I can detect this? I created this from the English version. Should I start from the French version instead? It was hard to get 4-5-6-7 in a line. Is there a better trick for that? For use on the Swedish Wikipedia, I'd like a slightly different illustration that shows the formation of eskers in more detail. Some inspiration can be found here and here. --LA2 (talk) 23:56, 11 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
OK. I'll have a look one of these days. I'll keep you posted. But now it's bedtime ;-). Lycaon (talk) 00:01, 12 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Märkliga krav?[edit]

Hej igen Lars! Om du ville titta lite på senaste rätt hårda krav på diskussionssidan till en:Jacob Truedson Demitz vore jag jättetacksam. Den ena (LaVidaLoca) skriver för en tid sedan att vi nu snart är färdiga med referenserna, så kommer nästa (Momoricks) idag och ställer högre och högre krav. Vill du kommentera någon av dessa nya krav där: 1) Pass är ingen källa (för födelsedatum o s v); 2) Expressen är ingen tillförlitlig källa; 3) Nästan alla de angivna källorna är otillförlitliga. Jag har jobbat jättehårt för att uppfylla alla krav och tog nu (anonymt) bort hans ena (roliga) smeknamn, eftersom han säger att det inte finns något publicerat om det annat än ett pass från 1980-talet där det fanns med. Eftersom den här artikeln gäller den som i huvudsak står bakom hela bilddonationen, som jag fått tillåtelse av att göra allt detta, är det särskilt känsligt och pinsamt för mig när de river och sliter i den. Jag kan tyvärr inte logga in på engelska Wikipedia för då dyker ett gäng på 3-4 arga på mig direkt. Jag blev riktigt rädd faktiskt och slutade där 1/12. M b h EmilEikS (talk) 11:24, 17 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jag tittade lite snabbt på detta och lämnade ett par små kommentarer. Men jag fattar inte riktigt vad det handlar om. Strävar du efter att lyfta artikelns erkännande från C- till B-nivå? Sådant kan säkert vara svårt. För det handlar väl inte om att den skulle vara hotad av radering? Eller? Vad gäller striden egentligen? --LA2 (talk) 13:49, 17 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Stort tack! Ja since you asked ska du få höra hela soppan senare ikväll. Nu ska jag iväg och hjälpa Christina Schollin med sin belysning utanför butiken. Bästa hälsn i all hast. EmilEikS (talk) 15:39, 17 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Svarat utförligt på din svenska diskussionssida. EmilEikS (talk) 22:40, 17 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Used one of your images[edit]

Hi, I just wanted to let you know that I used one of your images on my blog(s):

links removed

In case you have any questions, please con tact me

All the best Tam Hanna —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.178.74.20 (talk) 21 december 2008 kl. 17.58 (UTC)

That's fine. --LA2 (talk) 21:12, 21 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your bot request[edit]

Please see Commons:Administrators/Requests_and_votes#LA2-bot ... you have a question from 22 December that needs addressing... are you still interested in this bot? If not, just say so, no worries... Best wishes. ++Lar: t/c 03:20, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kart[edit]

Utifra diskusjonen på user talk:Jensens har jeg formelt slettenominert de omdiskuterte kartene slik at vi kan få en avklaring på om dette er noe vi kan beholde. Innspill og kommentarer på Commons:Deletion requests/Norway maps by user:Jensens er velkomne. Jeg legger denne meldingen hos alle som deltok i den opprinnelige diskusjonen til informasjon. Hilsen Finn Rindahl (talk) 18:40, 26 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

TUSC token 37cddf74594b60358c44f98c7ffe7834[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token 37cddf74594b60358c44f98c7ffe7834[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Bilder med kordinatsystemet UTM[edit]

Du har laddat upp några bilder med koordinatsystemet UTM. Problemet är att de föreställer MGRS-systemet som är en utbyggnad av UTM-systemet. Felet är lätt begånget. Utomlands händer det ofta att man blandar ihop UTM och MGRS, men i Sverige blandar man alltid ihop UTM med MGRS, då MGRS går under namnet UTM i de allra flesta av Lantmäteriets publikationer. Om du vill sätta dig in i skillnaderna finns en bra beskrivning av skilladerna och likheterna i Military Map Reading 201National Geospatioal-intelligence Agency's sajt. Johan G (talk) 13:10, 28 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jaha, kräver detta någon åtgärd från min sida? --LA2 (talk) 21:41, 28 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hoppsan, jag sade visst inte att jag känner för att flytta filerna till LA2-<kontinent>-MGRS-zones.png för att hindra missförstånd. Jag är är lite ovan och vågar inte börja flytta filer utan att fråga. Om det inte är för omständigt får du gärna flytta dem, jag tror att det var tre filer på Commons och SVWP. Johan G (talk) 05:38, 1 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, LA2!
Tip: Add categories to your images
Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:58, 25 August 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Don't be ridiculous. The template puts these images in Category:Meyers Blitz-Lexikon, exactly where they belong, because they are the logotype and spine of that very book. --LA2 (talk) 19:01, 25 August 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 02:20, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Oops, I must have slipped. Fixed now. --LA2 (talk) 02:23, 30 August 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Hej_Matematik.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

shizhao (talk) 19:06, 11 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deprecated License[edit]

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−


Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Hej Matematik.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 19:22, 11 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Corrected now. --LA2 (talk) 19:33, 11 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ah sorry, the template saved in nikbot settings was no permission since, so I've added also no permission without since and it should work now :-) Thank you for telling me the problem ;-) Bye! --Filnik\b[Rr]ock\b!? 09:44, 12 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]


"Uncategorized" files from "Blitz-Lexikon", File:LA2-Blitz-0367.jpg[edit]

Hello Lars Aronsson, several of your files from the Blitz-Lexikon are listed as files without category. Perhaps you can correct this. (I dont know the proper categories, if they are necessary in this case) Best wishes. Cholo Aleman (talk) 07:49, 13 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If you look at the file (0367), you can see that it clearly has a category, which is added by a template. I don't know why this file is considered to need more categories than that. --LA2 (talk) 10:44, 14 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dates[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you are doing some cleanup on dates. I had started listing some here. Emijrp and Schlurcher are doing some of them. Interesting note about dates on the mailing list BTW. -- User:Docu at 14:12, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Minor thing, but this might already have been a valid date format. -- User:Docu at 17:55, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Indeed! Is there any documentation of all the formats can already be parsed? --LA2 (talk) 17:58, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Maybe, but I doubt. You might want to ask Schlurcher or one of the editors of {{Information}}'s date functions. -- User:Docu at 18:10, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

People of Sweden[edit]

Hi, maybe you recall Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2010Jun#Categorizing_people. I added a few categories about persons to Category:People by name. Thus, the CatScans mentioned there should yield improved results. -- User:Docu at 18:59, 27 June 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Flatfish[edit]

Terve! Hej! As you uploaded this picture of fish I come here. Hippoglossus hippoglossus is a right-eyed flatfish, not left-eyed fish as shown. So, would you mind if I change the face of this fish? Platichthys flesus is OK. --DPC (talk) 19:53, 4 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't know what you mean with "change the face". The picture I uploaded is from an old book, and you should not alter this picture (Pieni 2 0139.jpg), because that would distort the representation of what was printed in that book. (Old books often contain statements, that we now know are wrong. We should not try to "fix" old books, but present them as they were printed.) Since the picture is free from copyright, you are free to produce derivate works that you can upload under a different filename. I have no opinion about the other filenames. --LA2 (talk) 09:16, 5 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, that's why I came here to ask you. I know it is a plate of an old book and I know that changing it I would distort the representation of what was printed in that book, so I don´t want to change anything in "Pieni 2 0139.jpg", perhaps write a description note warning of the wrong position of the flatfish. But I do believe necessary to rotate the figure "Hippoglossus hippoglossus (Pieni).jpg" because I suppose that having cut it, you have tried to show that fish in particular, not the plate of the book as such. (Now I notice you haven't done it, it was user Kilom691, so I should ask him too).
What "change the face" means: Flatfish have both eyes together on one side of the body. Some species have both eyes on the right side and other on the left side, and it is a character to know what species are we talking about. You can read more [2] and here. So "to change the face" (I don't know if it's the better way to say it) means to show flatfish as it is, in this case with both eyes on the right side. Yo can see which is the right or left side looking at the pelvic fin wich should be on the bottom; the mouth position, the anal fin, etc. Thanks for your time. --DPC (talk) 10:31, 5 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I have not been involved in "Hippoglossus hippoglossus (Pieni).jpg". --LA2 (talk) 13:48, 5 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:Forstlingen_test_drive_2006.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

190.233.195.155 17:46, 8 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No reason for deletion given. Nothing is wrong with the file. Was this a prank? --LA2 (talk) 11:11, 10 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:Nyiostergotland_2010_ar.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Antemister (talk) 14:16, 17 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Nyiostergotland_2010_fa.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Antemister (talk) 19:09, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Nyiostergotland_2010_fr.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Antemister (talk) 19:09, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Nyiostergotland_2010_so.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Antemister (talk) 19:09, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Nyiostergotland_2010_ckb.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Antemister (talk) 19:09, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Nyiostergotland_2010_sv.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Antemister (talk) 19:09, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Nyiostergotland_2010_en.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Antemister (talk) 19:10, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Unknown Swedish engraver[edit]

Hi LA2, I'm not an expert on engravers, so I was hoping perhaps you know the name of the engraver responsible for this file: File:IMG 9245 Allers no1 1899 Ernst Westerlund.JPG. There´s a signature in the lower right corner which says A mörk or something . --Vogler (talk) 15:40, 5 May 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have no idea how this engraver can be. --LA2 (talk) 15:48, 5 May 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Maybe the signature says "Bork". I will continue the research, the engraver might be Danish, it's difficult though when I'm not even sure about the name for a start. --Vogler (talk) 21:04, 5 May 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I heard the pin drop near the pump....[edit]

Thank you for providing a commons related chuckle; the first I've had here in a few days. :)

Do you have a specific or particular "AR Drone" video that is in need of a special source based category? And do you think that there will be many of this type of video? -- Queeg (talk) 10:52, 18 August 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No, I don't have any video. I'm looking around for inspiration, and was surprised I didn't find any. --LA2 (talk) 11:20, 18 August 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
If I remember correctly, that category was one of the first that I looked for when sorting through the videos here. Then I started to become confused with where "aerial" would start and end. Starting from an aircraft but ending with orbiting vehicles? I think that the actual source of the photograph is a better way to go. Category:Videos by technique and even that has some problems since images from Hubble get used in videos (usually like a slide show or with a zoom) and are from both a telescope and a satellite. And other than being colorful and often pretty, are not the makings of great videos -- but this is a digression.
I have been stymied by this set of non-misnomers: Category:High-speed photography and Category:Slow motion videos. Oxymoron means "conjoining contradictory terms" but these two contradictory terms are really the same thing and to the best of my vocabulary seem to be in need of a new terminology to describe them. Something like "contraveritic", maybe. -- Queeg (talk) 18:31, 18 August 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:Nyiostergotland_2010_en.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:22, 1 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

How did you get a complete London Gazette issue?[edit]

Hi! Just wondering how you downloaded a whole copy of File:The London Gazette 19345.djvu? It seems that one can only download single pages as PDFs, and that I might be missing something obvious. I just thought I'd ask, before I start downloading one page-by-page and reconstructing it locally.  :-) Thanks! — Sam Wilson ( TalkContribs ) … 01:44, 1 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Salt water fish with Finnish text.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 09:42, 6 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Wikisource by validated pages.png[edit]

Updated graph

Hi,

Could you do a 2013 version of File:Wikisource by validated pages.png ?

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 15:29, 19 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Here you go! --LA2 (talk) 09:32, 3 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you! VIGNERON (talk) 21:18, 5 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Hello, LA2. You have new messages at Stefan4's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 23:19, 4 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Cohrs atlas över Sverige 0027 Gävle Eskilstuna.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 21:02, 8 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 01:04, 18 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wikisource Bot[edit]

Please see s:Wikisource:Scriptorium#BOT_approval_requests also left a note on your Wikisource talk page.

Wikisource by validated pages: 2014[edit]

Dear LA2,

may you update File:Wikisource by validated pages.png once again? May you also provide your plotting script?--Kopiersperre (talk) 23:32, 24 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kajsa Ekis Ekman 2010 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Krd 14:43, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kajsa Ekis Ekman 2010 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Krd 14:43, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kajsa Ekis Ekman 2010 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jopparn (talk) 11:23, 12 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kajsa Ekis Ekman 2010 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jopparn (talk) 11:23, 12 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kajsa Ekis Ekman 2010 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jopparn (talk) 11:23, 12 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kajsa Ekis Ekman[edit]

Hi, the Commons Volunteer Response Team has received an eMail stating that the depicted person of these photos ( [1] [2] [3] ) is not Kajsa Ekis Ekman. Do you think that is correct? If so, I would remove "Kajsa Ekis Ekman" from the filenames and the photos from the categories.    FDMS  4    15:05, 28 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This photo can be Donald Duck and I can be Mickey Mouse for all that I care. Does that make you happy? As you can see from previous discussions on this page, the images have long waited to be deleted. --LA2 (talk) 21:30, 10 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
If you're implying that she is indeed depicted on the photos but don't want to explicitly say so, that's unfortunate.    FDMS  4    22:06, 10 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wikipedia contributors per language speakers[edit]

Dear Lars,

I found your plot of the development of Wikipedia contributors per million speakers of a language very interesting. And I've tried to update it. As a beginner to gnuplot I would like to ask you for improvements.--Kopiersperre (talk) 21:40, 1 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:LA2-20080403-Halmstadkonferensen.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 06:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Trotsk map 1928.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Alex Spade (talk) 19:38, 12 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Help with category[edit]

Hello LA2, how are you? Yesterday I did the category Files with closed captioning in Brazilian Portuguese, because when I sent an translation in ptbr to any video, it wasn't included in any category. So, could you help to make the category appear in all the files with ptbr subtitles? I suspect that exist some automatically way to do that. Thanks, Erick Soares3 (talk) 12:25, 22 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Sv-Esbo.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Migro (talk) 17:13, 19 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear LA2,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:38, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Äntligen maj: Wiki Loves Earth 2023![edit]

Förra årets vinnarbild i Wiki Loves Earth!

Hej,
(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Earth 2023 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet eftersom du tidigare har bidragit med bilder till de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Earth eller Wiki Loves Monuments. Jag hoppas att du vill vara med i år också! Som vanligt ingår naturreservat och nationalparker, biosfärområden och naturminnen i tävlingen! Nytt för i år är att vi utöver bästa foto även belönar fotograferande av tidigare ofotograferade objekt samt bästa bildserie om minst tio fotografier av samma objekt. Tävlingen börjar 1 maj, och pågår under hela maj månad. Om du har varit ute i världen och rest kan du även se om resorna sammanfaller med övriga internationella deltävlingar, och i så fall vara med och tävla även där. Expeditioner, fotosafari eller en helt vanlig promenad? Via en smidig karta som visar ditt närområde hittar du bra ställen att besöka – eller varför inte damma av fotoalbumen och tävla med bilder du har tagit tidigare?

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 12:46, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]