User talk:Mike Peel

Archives 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17

Welcome to my talk page. Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page, use headlines when starting new talk topics and sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. I will generally reply on this page to keep conversations together; please watch this page for a short time after leaving a comment. Uncivil comments will be reverted without response. Thank you. Start a new talk topic. If you would prefer to contact me off-wiki, then my contact details and a contact form are available on my personal website.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:00, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 147.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:00, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At São Carlos 2018 183.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:54, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2018 341.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 16:24, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 172.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:29, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 174.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:48, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Memorial Aeroespacial Brasileiro 2019 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:48, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 311.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted, look at the see horizon --Poco a poco 19:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC) @Poco a poco: Thanks for looking, rotated, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 12:01, 17 December 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:56, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 353.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted --Poco a poco 19:37, 16 December 2023 (UTC) @Poco a poco: Thanks for looking, rotated, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 12:04, 17 December 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:56, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good IMO. --JiriMatejicek 09:19, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Cidade Universitária Armando de Salles Oliveira 2023 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good IMO. --JiriMatejicek 09:19, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 707.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC)  Comment No issue with the promotion, but the filename "At Tenerife" somehow doesn't match the actual subject "Ford Mondeo Mk4 hatchback". --Plozessor 10:16, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 066.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Any chance to recover the shadows (under the roof) a bit? --Plozessor 05:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC) @Plozessor: Thanks for looking, brightened, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:43, 19 December 2023 (UTC)  Support Yes! --Plozessor 19:52, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. A little bit too dark, but acceptable. --XRay 05:04, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Singapore 2023 047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:55, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 208.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I'm not the biggest fan of this crop, but technical quality is good. --MB-one 10:59, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Cidade Universitária Armando de Salles Oliveira 2023 045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:21, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Cidade Universitária Armando de Salles Oliveira 2023 050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:21, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Cidade Universitária Armando de Salles Oliveira 2023 052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:21, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please check for CAs (at the branches). --XRay 05:05, 19 December 2023 (UTC) @XRay: Thanks for looking, CAs tweeked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Yes, thank you. --XRay 05:50, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 181 - Bust of Catulo da Paixão Cearense.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support This is ok but please give it more specific filename. --Plozessor 17:38, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 197.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 16:46, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 314 - road to Mesa del Mar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Picture is ok but please give it a more specific filename. --Plozessor 19:41, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Slightly overprocessed smartphone picture, but just about acceptable IMO. --Plozessor 19:36, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bust of Florencio Sánchez, Montevideo 2017 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:30, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento a José Enrique Rodó 2017 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Acceptable at 3MP, though not as good as I would expect from an APS-C camera at ISO 100. --Plozessor 19:30, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Wish you a very happy Christmas! :-) Haoreima (talk) 19:05, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2017 161.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:28, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2017 170.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 09:10, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2017 184.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:28, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At São Carlos 2018 081.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:35, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 195 - Busto de Juscelino Kubitschek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, please give it a better filename. --Plozessor 05:46, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Cidade Universitária Armando de Salles Oliveira 2023 032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This is a bit noisy and a bit dark and lacks sharpness. Maybe all of that can be fixed with better raw conversion. --Plozessor 05:52, 22 December 2023 (UTC) @Plozessor: Thanks for looking, brightened, sharpened, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 07:47, 22 December 2023 (UTC) To be honest, now it's too much denoised, check the trees. --Plozessor 09:02, 22 December 2023 (UTC) I've had another go, backing off on denoising, but the background trees aren't in focus. --Mike Peel 09:43, 22 December 2023 (UTC)  Support Thx, I think now it's an acceptable compromise. --Plozessor 11:28, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Cidade Universitária Armando de Salles Oliveira 2023 051.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sorry, but this is too noisy and lacks sharpness. Unfortunately many of your images, @Mike Peel, are far below what I'd expect from conditions (camera, ISO, exposure time). Maybe there's a flaw in your RAW conversion process or camera settings. --Plozessor 05:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC) @Plozessor: Thanks for looking, sharpened and denoised, but I think the focus was slightly off here. The older photos I post here were taken with a superzoom lens, which unfortunately degraded image quality in all but the best light, but ones from the last 2 years are with a new lens so should generally be better. Thanks. Mike Peel 07:53, 22 December 2023 (UTC)  Support Thanks for explanation. Now this one is just about acceptable. --Plozessor 09:02, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 312.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:11, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Cidade Universitária Armando de Salles Oliveira 2023 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you get that sharper? --Plozessor 19:36, 21 December 2023 (UTC) @Plozessor: Thanks for looking, sharpened. Thanks. Mike Peel 21:16, 21 December 2023 (UTC)  Support Acceptable now. --Plozessor 07:31, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 209.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please think about the verticals, left part is hanging a bit to the right --Michielverbeek 07:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC) @Michielverbeek: Verticals tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:53, 19 December 2023 (UTC) QI now --Michielverbeek 07:58, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Demolition of the Manchester Precinct Centre 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment A bit noisy, isn't it ? --Sebring12Hrs 10:32, 17 December 2023 (UTC) @Sebring12Hrs: Thanks for looking, noise reduced, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 12:27, 17 December 2023 (UTC)  Support Looks good now. --Plozessor 09:16, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Paranapiacaba 2023 134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 10:10, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:09, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:13, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Parque Buenos Aires 2023 096.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:41, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Ibirapuera Park 2023 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:09, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 08:46, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York, USA 2017 197.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:06, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At São Carlos 2018 089.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 10:20, 24 December 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Thi 21:09, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 December 2023 (UTC)